Aspectos epidemiológicos, manejo clínico y resultados a corto plazo en pacientes mayores diagnosticados de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en urgencias en España: resultados del estudio EDEN-34 / Epidemiological aspects, clinical management and short-term outcomes in elderly patients diagnosed with acute heart failure in the emergency department in Spain: results of the EDEN-34 study

Objetivo: Estimar la incidencia de diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en pacientes mayores en los servicios de urgencias (SU), la confirmación diagnóstica de la ICA en pacientes hospitalizados y los eventos adversos a corto plazo. Método: Se incluyeron a todos los pacientes de ≥65 años atendidos en 52 SU españoles durante una semana y se seleccionaron los diagnosticados de ICA. En los hospitalizados se recogieron los diagnosticados de ICA al alta. Como eventos adversos, se recogió la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días, y evento adverso combinado (muerte u hospitalización) a 30 días posalta. Se calcularon las odds ratio (OR) ajustadas de las características demográficas, de estado basal y a la llegada al SU asociadas con mortalidad y evento adverso posalta a 30 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1.155 pacientes con ICA (incidencia anual: 26,5 por 1.000 habitantes ≥65 años, IC95%: 25,0-28,1). En el 86%, el diagnóstico de ICA constaba al alta. La mortalidad global a 30 días fue del 10,7%, la intrahospitalaria del 7,9% y el evento combinado posalta del 15,6%. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días se asoció con hipotensión arterial (OR ajustada: 74,0, IC95%: 5,39-1.015.; y 42,6, 3,74-485, respectivamente) e hipoxemia (2,14, 1,27-3,61; y 1,87, 1,19-2,93) a la llegada a urgencias y con precisar ayuda en la deambulación (2,24, 1,04-4,83; y 2,48, 1,27-4,86) y la edad (por cada incremento de 10 años; 1,54, 1,04-2,29, y 1,60, 1,13-2,28). Conclusiones: La ICA es un diagnóstico frecuente en los pacientes mayores que consultan en los SU. El deterioro funcional, la edad, la hipotensión e hipoxemia son los factores que más se asocian a mortalidad.(AU)

Objective: To estimate the incidence of acute heart failure (AHF) diagnosis in elderly patients in emergency departments (ED), diagnostic confirmation in hospitalized patients, and short-term adverse events. Methods: All patients aged ≥65 years attended in 52 Spanish EDs during 1 week were included and those diagnosed with AHF were selected. In hospitalized patients, those diagnosed with AHF at discharge were collected. As adverse events, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and combined adverse event (death or hospitalization) at 30 days post-discharge were collected. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for association of demographic variables, baseline status and constants at ED arrival with mortality and 30-day post-discharge adverse event were calculated. Results: We included 1,155 patients with AHF (annual incidence: 26.5 per 1000 inhabitants ≥65 years, 95%CI: 25.0-28.1). In 86% the diagnosis of AHF was known at discharge. Overall 30-day mortality was 10.7% and in-hospital mortality was 7.9%, and the combined event in 15.6%. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was associated with arterial hypotension (adjusted OR: 74.0, 95%CI: 5.39-1015. and 42.6, 3.74-485, respectively and hypoxemia (2.14, 1.27-3.61; and 1.87, 1.19-2.93) on arrival at the ED and requiring assistance with ambulation (2.24, 1.04-4.83; and 2.48, 1.27-4.86) and age (per 10-year increment; 1.54, 1.04-2.29; and 1.60, 1.13-2.28). The combined post-discharge adverse event was not associated with any characteristic. Conclusions: AHF is a frequent diagnosis in elderly patients consulting in the ED. The functional impairment, age, hypotension and hypoxemia are the factors most associated with mortality.(AU)

Comparative MRI analysis of the forebrain of three sauropsida models.

The study of the brain by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows to obtain detailed anatomical images, useful to describe specific encephalic structures and to analyze possible variabilities. It is widely used in clinical practice and is becoming increasingly used in veterinary medicine, even in exotic animals; however, despite its potential, its use in comparative neuroanatomy studies is still incipient. It is a technology that in recent years has significantly improved anatomical resolution, together with the fact that it is non-invasive and allows for systematic comparative analysis. All this makes it particularly interesting and useful in evolutionary neuroscience studies, since it allows for the analysis and comparison of brains of rare or otherwise inaccessible species. In the present study, we have analyzed the prosencephalon of three representative sauropsid species, the turtle Trachemys scripta (order Testudine), the lizard Pogona vitticeps (order Squamata) and the snake Python regius (order Squamata) by MRI. In addition, we used MRI sections to analyze the total brain volume and ventricular system of these species, employing volumetric and chemometric analyses together. The raw MRI data of the sauropsida models analyzed in the present study are available for viewing and downloading and have allowed us to produce an atlas of the forebrain of each of the species analyzed, with the main brain regions. In addition, our volumetric data showed that the three groups presented clear differences in terms of total and ventricular brain volumes, particularly the turtles, which in all cases presented distinctive characteristics compared to the lizards and snakes.

Epidemiological aspects, clinical management and short-term outcomes in elderly patients diagnosed with acute heart failure in the emergency department in Spain: results of the EDEN-34 study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of acute heart failure (AHF) diagnosis in elderly patients in emergency departments (ED), diagnostic confirmation in hospitalized patients, and short-term adverse events. METHODS: All patients aged ≥65 years attended in 52 Spanish EDs during 1 week were included and those diagnosed with AHF were selected. In hospitalized patients, those diagnosed with AHF at discharge were collected. As adverse events, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and combined adverse event (death or hospitalization) at 30 days post-discharge were collected. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for association of demographic variables, baseline status and constants at ED arrival with mortality and 30-day post-discharge adverse event were calculated. RESULTS: We included 1,155 patients with AHF (annual incidence: 26.5 per 1000 inhabitants ≥65 years, 95% CI: 25.0-28.1). In 86% the diagnosis of AHF was known at discharge. Overall 30-day mortality was 10.7% and in-hospital mortality was 7.9%, and the combined event in 15.6%. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was associated with arterial hypotension (adjusted OR: 74.0, 95% CI: 5.39-1015. and 42.6, 3.74-485, respectively and hypoxemia (2.14, 1.27-3.61; and 1.87, 1.19-2.93) on arrival at the ED and requiring assistance with ambulation (2.24, 1.04-4.83; and 2.48, 1.27-4.86) and age (per 10-year increment; 1.54, 1.04-2.29; and 1.60, 1.13-2.28). The combined post-discharge adverse event was not associated with any characteristic. CONCLUSIONS: AHF is a frequent diagnosis in elderly patients consulting in the ED. The functional impairment, age, hypotension and hypoxemia are the factors most associated with mortality.

[Prognosis in elderly patients with falls treated in emergency departments: The EDEN-3 study]. / Pronóstico en pacientes ancianos con caídas atendidos en servicios de urgencias: estudio EDEN-3.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether falls in people ≥65 years old are a prognostic factor for adverse events compared to the rest of older patients who consult emergency departments, and identify factors related to a worse long-term evolution. METHOD: EDEN cohort that included patients ≥65 years old. Those patients who consulted for fall and the rest were distinguished. Twelve variables were collected. For comparison: two groups matched by fall propensity score. We compared mortality at one year and combined adverse event post-discharge at one year. In patients with falls, variables independently related to evolution were identified. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred and forty-five patients treated for falls and 22,920 for other reasons. Mortality at one year was 14.4% (9.5% vs. 15.0%, respectively, P<.001) and the combined post-discharge adverse event at one year was 60.6% (52.2% vs. 61.7%, respectively, P<.001). In 4748 patients matched by fall propensity score (2372 in each group), the inverse association between consultation for fall and mortality (HR: 0.705, 95% CI: 0.5880.846) and post-discharge combined adverse event (0.758, 0.701-0.820) remained significant. Factors associated with mortality in patients with falls were ≥80 years (2.097, 1.521-2.891) and comorbidity (2.393, 1.574-3.636) while being female was a protective factor (0.758, 0.584-0.985). Between the factors associated with post-discharge combined adverse hospitalization in the index event was a protective factor (0.804, 0.685-0.943). CONCLUSIONS: Patients over 65 years of age treated in the emergency room for falls have a better prognosis. Hospitalization was a protective factor of combined postdischarge adverse event.

Epidemiología y calidad asistencial de las intoxicaciones agudas en el adulto mayor de 65 años en Alicante, España / Epidemiology and quality of care of acute intoxication in people over 65 years of age in Alicante, Spain

Introducción El objetivo fue estudiar la epidemiología de las intoxicaciones agudas en el servicio de urgencias (SU) de un centro de tercer nivel y analizar el grado de cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad (IC) en pacientes ≥65 años comparado con el resto de los adultos. Material y métodos Estudio observacional y retrospectivo, se incluyeron los casos diagnosticados de intoxicación aguda de pacientes >14 años atendidos en el SU de un hospital terciario. Se recogieron las variables demográficas, tipo de tóxicos y causa de la intoxicación, 19 IC y destino, siendo la variable de resultado el grado de cumplimiento de los IC. Resultados Se registraron 1.144 casos, 10,4% (n=119) personas ≥65 años. Hubo mayor proporción de mujeres en este grupo (72,8 vs. 60,9%; p=0,015), más intoxicación accidental (37,6 vs. 25,7% p=0,006), y menos voluntaria (35,0 vs. 49,6%; p=0,003), menos intoxicación por alcohol (5 vs. 17,8%; <0,001) y ningún caso intoxicado por drogas ilegales (p<0,001). En la mayoría de los IC tenían un alto grado de cumplimento (> 85%) en personas ≥65 años como en el resto de los adultos. De todos los IC hubo diferencias en la indicación de oxigenoterapia en el caso de intoxicación por monóxido de carbono (CO) en aquellos ≥65 años (64,2 vs. 40,9%; p=0,005). Conclusiones El perfil epidemiológico de la intoxicación en personas ≥65 años es diferente al de los más jóvenes y con un cumplimiento de los IC. Dado los resultados obtenidos no consideramos que existan diferencias en la asistencia del paciente intoxicado con respecto a su edad (AU)

Introduction The objective of this study was to examine the epidemiology of acute poisonings in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary center and to analyze the compliance level with quality indicators (QIs) in patients 65 years and older compared rest of adults. Materials and methods This was an observational and retrospective study that included diagnosed cases of acute poisoning in patients over 14 years old treated in the ED of a tertiary hospital. Demographic variables, type of toxic substances, and cause of poisoning were collected, along with 19 QIs and patient outcomes, with the main outcome variable being the degree of compliance with the QIs. Results A total of 1144 cases were recorded, with 10.4% (n=119) being patients 65 years and older. Patients 65 years and older were more likely to be female (72.8% vs. 60.9%; p=0.015), experience more accidental poisonings (37.6% vs. 25.7%; p=0.006), and fewer intentional poisonings (35.0% vs. 49.6%; p=0.003). There were fewer cases of alcohol poisoning (5% vs. 17.8%; p<0.001), and no cases of illegal drug poisoning (p<0.001) in this age group. Most QIs showed a high degree of compliance (>85%) in both patients 65 years and older and rest of adults. However, there were differences in the indication of oxygen therapy in cases of carbon monoxide poisoning (64.2% vs. 40.9%; p=0.005). Conclusions The epidemiological profile of poisoning in patients 65 years and older differs from that of adult patients, with a similar degree of compliance with QIs. Based on the results obtained, there does not appear to be significant differences in the management of poisoned patients based on their age (AU)

Factores asociados al tratamiento crónico no justificado con digoxina en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y relación con el pronóstico a corto plazo / Factors associated with unjustified chronic treatment with digoxin in patients with acute heart failure and relationship with short-term prognosis

Objetivos Analizar los factores relacionados con el tratamiento crónico inadecuado con digoxina, y si esta inadecuación impacta en la evolución a corto plazo. Método Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en tratamiento crónico con digoxina, y se clasificaron como con tratamiento indicado o no indicado, investigándose los factores asociados a este hecho, y si se asociaba a mortalidad intrahospitalaria a 30 días, estancia hospitalaria prolongada (>7 días) y evento adverso combinado (reconsulta a urgencias, hospitalización por ICA o muerte por cualquier causa) durante los 30 días postalta. Resultados Se analizaron 2.366 pacientes en tratamiento crónico con digoxina (mediana=83 años, mujeres=61%): adecuado en 1.373 casos (58,0%), inadecuado en 993 (42,0%). La inadecuación se asoció con mayor edad, menor comorbilidad, menor tratamiento con betabloqueantes e IECA, mejor función ventricular y peor índice de Barthel. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días fue mayor en pacientes con tratamiento inadecuado (9,9 versus 7,6%, p=0,05; y 12,6 versus 9,1%, p<0,001; respectivamente); no hubo diferencias en estancia prolongada (35,7 versus 33,8%) ni en eventos adversos posalta (32,9 versus 31,8%). Ajustando las diferencias basales y del episodio de descompensación, el tratamiento crónico inadecuado con digoxina no se asoció con ningún resultado, con odds ratio de 1,31 (IC 95%: 0,85-2,03) para mortalidad intrahospitalaria, 1,29 (0,74-2,25) para mortalidad a 30 días; 1,07 (0,82-1,40) para estancia prolongada y 0,88 (0,65-1,19) para evento adverso posalta. Conclusión Existe un perfil de paciente que recibe de forma inadecuada tratamiento crónico con digoxina, si bien ello no se asocia con resultados adversos a corto plazo durante los episodios de ICA (AU)

Objectives To analyze the factors related to inadequate chronic treatment with digoxin and whether the inadequacy of treatment has an impact on short-term outcome. Method Patients diagnosed with AHF who were in chronic treatment with digoxin were selected. Digoxin treatment was classified as adequate or inadequate. We investigated factors associated to inadequacy and whether such inadequacy was associated with in-hospital and 30-day mortality, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days) and combined adverse event (re-consultation to the ED or hospitalization for AHF or death from any cause) during the 30 days after discharge. Results We analyzed 2366 patients on chronic digoxin treatment (median age=83 years, women=61%), which was considered adequate in 1373 cases (58.0%) and inadequate in 993 (42.0%). The inadequacy was associated with older age, less comorbidity, less treatment with beta-blockers and renin–angiotensin inhibitors, better ventricular function, and worse Barthel index. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was higher in patients with inadequate digoxin treatment (9.9% vs. 7.6%, p=0.05; and 12.6% vs. 9.1%, p<0.001, respectively). No differences were recorded in prolonged stay (35.7% vs. 33.8%) or post-discharge adverse events (32.9% vs. 31.8%). In the model adjusted for baseline and decompensation episode differences, inadequate treatment with digoxin was not significantly associated with any outcome, with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI=0.85-2.03) for in-hospital mortality; 1.29 (0.74-2.25) for 30-day mortality; 1.07 (0.82-1.40) for prolonged stay; and 0.88 (0.65-1.19) for post-discharge adverse event. Conclusion There is a profile of patients with AHF who inadequately receive digoxin, although this inadequateness for chronic digitalis treatment was not associated with short-term adverse outcomes (AU)

Factors associated with unjustified chronic treatment with digoxin in patients with acute heart failure and relationship with short-term prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the factors related to inadequate chronic treatment with digoxin and whether the inadequacy of treatment has an impact on short-term outcome. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with AHF who were in chronic treatment with digoxin, were selected. Digoxin treatment was classified as adequate or inadequate. We investigated factors associated to inadequacy and whether such inadequacy was associated with in-hospital and 30-day mortality, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days) and combined adverse event (re-consultation to the ED or hospitalization for AHF or death from any cause) during the 30 days after discharge. RESULTS: We analyzed 2,366 patients on chronic digoxin treatment (median age = 83 years, women = 61%), which was considered adequate in 1,373 cases (58.0%) and inadequate in 993 (42.0%). The inadequacy was associated with older age, less comorbidity, less treatment with beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin inhibitors, better ventricular function, and worse Barthel index. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was higher in patients with inadequate digoxin treatment (9.9% versus 7.6%, p = 0.05; and 12.6% versus 9.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). No differences were recorded in prolonged stay (35.7% versus 33.8%) or post-discharge adverse events (32.9% versus 31.8%). In the model adjusted for baseline and decompensation episode differences, inadequate treatment with digoxin was not significantly associated with any outcome, with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95%CI = 0.85-2.03) for in-hospital mortality; 1.29 (0.74-2.25) for 30-day mortality; 1.07 (0.82-1.40) for prolonged stay; and 0.88 (0.65-1.19) for post-discharge adverse event. CONCLUSION: There is a profile of patients with AHF who inadequately receive digoxin, although this inadequateness for chronic digitalis treatment was not associated with short-term adverse outcomes.

Validación de la escala COVID-19-12O para predecir reingreso/revisita en pacientes con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 dados de alta desde Urgencias / Validation of the COVID-19-12O score for predicting readmissions/revisits in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged from the emergency department

Objective The COVID-19-12O-score has been validated to determine the risk of respiratory failure in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Our study aims to assess whether the score is effective in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged from a hospital emergency department (HED) to predict readmission and revisit. Metho Retrospective cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged consecutively from an HUS of a tertiary hospital, from January 7 to February 17, 2021, where we applied the COVID-19-12O -score, with a cut-off point of 9 points to define the risk of admission or revisit. The primary outcome variable was revisit with or without hospital readmission after 30 days of discharge from HUS. Results We included 77 patients, with a median age of 59 years, 63.6% men and Charlson index of 2. 9.1% had an emergency room revisit and 15.3% had a deferred hospital admission. The relative risk (RR) for emergency journal was 0.46 (0.04–4.62, 95% CI, p=0.452), and the RR for hospital readmission was 6.88 (1.20–39.49, 95% CI, p<0.005). Conclusions The COVID-19-12O -score is effective in determining the risk of hospital readmission in patients discharged from HED with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, but is not useful for assessing the risk of revisit (AU)

Objetivo La escala COVID-19-12O se ha validado para determinar el riesgo de insuficiencia respiratoria en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19. Nuestro estudio pretende evaluar si la escala es efectiva en pacientes con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 dados de alta desde un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) para predecir el reingreso y revisita. Método Cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 dados de alta de forma consecutiva desde un SUH de un hospital terciario, del 7 de enero al 17 de febrero de 2021, donde aplicamos la escala COVID-19-12O, con un punto de corte de 9 puntos para definir el riesgo de ingreso o revisita. La variable de resultado principal fue la revisita con o sin reingreso hospitalario tras los 30 días de su alta desde el SUH. Resultados Se incluyeron 77 pacientes, con una edad mediana de 59 años, 63,6 % hombres e índice Charlson de 2. El 9,1 % tuvieron revisita a urgencias y en el 15,3 % se produjo un ingreso hospitalario diferido. El riesgo relativo (RR) para revista de urgencias fue 0,46 (0,04−4,62, IC 95 %, p=0,452), y el RR para el reingreso hospitalario de 6,88 (1,20–39,49, IC 95 %, p<0,005). Conclusiones La escala COVID-19-12O es efectiva en determinar el riesgo de reingreso hospitalario en pacientes dados de alta desde el SUH con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2, pero no es útil para valorar el riesgo de revisita (AU)

Validation of the COVID-19-12O score for predicting readmissions/revisits in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged from the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19-12O-score has been validated to determine the risk of respiratory failure in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Our study aims to assess whether the score is effective in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged from a hospital emergency department (HED) to predict readmission and revisit. METHOD: Retrospective cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged consecutively from an HUS of a tertiary hospital, from January 7 to February 17, 2021, where we applied the COVID-19-12O -score, with a cut-off point of 9 points to define the risk of admission or revisit. The primary outcome variable was revisit with or without hospital readmission after 30 days of discharge from HUS. RESULTS: We included 77 patients, with a median age of 59 years, 63.6% men and Charlson index of 2. 9.1% had an emergency room revisit and 15.3% had a deferred hospital admission. The relative risk (RR) for emergency journal was 0.46 (0.04-4.62, 95% CI, p=0.452), and the RR for hospital readmission was 6.88 (1.20-39.49, 95% CI, p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19-12O -score is effective in determining the risk of hospital readmission in patients discharged from HED with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, but is not useful for assessing the risk of revisit.

[Validation of the COVID-19-12O score for predicting readmissions/revisits in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged from the emergency department]. / Validación de la escala COVID-19-12O para predecir reingreso/revisita en pacientes con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 dados de alta desde Urgencias.

Objective: The COVID-19-12O score has been validated for determining the risk of respiratory failure in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. This study aims to assess whether the score is effective for predicting readmissions and revisits in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged from a hospital emergency department (HED). Method: This work is a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia discharged from the HED of a tertiary hospital from January 7 to February 17, 2021. The COVID-19-12O score with a cut-off point of nine points was used to define the risk of admissions or revisits. The primary outcome variable was a revisit with or without hospital readmission after 30 days of discharge from the HED. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included. The median age was 59 years, 63.6% were men, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2. A total of 9.1% had an emergency room revisit and 15.3% had a deferred hospital admission. The relative risk (RR) for an HED revisit was 0.46 (0.04-4.62, 95% CI p = 0.452) and the RR for hospital readmission was 6.88 (1.20-39.49, 95% CI, p < 0.005). Conclusions: The COVID-19-12O score is effective in determining the risk of hospital readmission in patients discharged from an HED with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, but is not useful for assessing the risk of revisit.

Analysis of the effectiveness and safety of short-stay units in the hospitalization of patients with acute heart failure. Propensity Score SSU-EAHFE.

OBJECTIVES: This work aims to analyze if hospitalization in short-stay units (SSU) of patients diagnosed in the emergency department with acute heart failure (AHF) is effective in terms of the length of hospital stay and if it is associated with differences in short-term progress. METHOD: Patients from the EAHFE registry diagnosed with AHF who were admitted to the SSU (SSU group) were included and compared to those hospitalized in other departments (non-SSU group) from all hospitals (comparison A) and, separately, those from hospitals with an SSU (comparison B) and without an SSU (comparison C). For each comparison, patients in the SSU/non-SSU groups were matched by propensity score. The length of hospital stay (efficacy), 30-day mortality, and post-discharge adverse events at 30 days (safety) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2,003 SSU patients and 12,193 non-SSU patients were identified. Of them, 674 pairs of patients were matched for comparison A, 634 for comparison B, and 588 for comparison C. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the SSU group in all comparisons (A: median 4 days (IQR = 2-5) versus 8 (5-12) days, p < 0.001; B: 4 (2-5) versus 8 (5-12), p < 0.001; C: 4 (2-5) versus 8 (6-12), p < 0.001). Admission to the SSU was not associated with differences in mortality (A: HR = 1.027, 95%CI = 0.681-1.549; B: 0.976, 0.647-1.472; C: 0.818, 0.662-1.010) or post-discharge adverse events (A: HR = 1.002, 95%CI = 0.816-1.232; B: 0.983, 0.796-1.215; C: 1.135, 0.905-1.424). CONCLUSION: The hospitalization of patients with AHF in the SSU is associated with shorter hospital stays but there were no differences in short-term progress.

Pronóstico de la insuficiencia cardíaca aguda basado en datos clínicos de congestión / Prognosis of acute heart failure based on clinical data of congestion

Antecedentes y objetivos Evaluar si los síntomas/signos de congestión en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda (ICA) atendidos en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) permiten predecir la evolución a corto plazo. Pacientes y métodos Pacientes consecutivos diagnosticados de ICA en 45 SUH del registro EAHFE. Recogimos variables clínicas de congestión sistémica (edemas en miembros inferiores, ingurgitación yugular, hepatomegalia) y pulmonar (disnea de esfuerzo, disnea paroxística nocturna, ortopnea y crepitantes pulmonares) analizando su asociación con la mortalidad por cualquier causa a 30 días, de forma cruda y ajustada por diferencias entre grupos. Resultado Analizamos 18.120 pacientes (mediana=83 años, rango intercuartil [RIC]=76-88; mujeres=55,7%). El 44,6% presentaba >3 síntomas/signos congestivos. Individualmente, el riesgo ajustado de muerte a 30 días se incrementó un 14% para la existencia de ingurgitación yugular (hazard ratio [HR]=1,14; intervalo de confianza al 95% [IC 95%]=1,01-1,28) y un 96% para la disnea de esfuerzo (HR=1,96; IC 95%=1,55-2,49). Valorados conjuntamente, el riesgo se incrementó progresivamente con el número de síntomas/signos presentes; así, respecto a los pacientes sin síntomas/signos de congestión, el riesgo incrementó un 109, 123 y 156% en pacientes con 1-2, 3-5 y 6-7 síntomas/signos, respectivamente. Estas asociaciones no mostraron interacción con la disposición final del paciente tras su atención en urgencias (alta/hospitalización), con excepción de edemas en extremidades inferiores, que tuvieron mejor pronóstico en pacientes dados de alta (HR=0,66; IC 95%=0,49-0,89) que en los hospitalizados (HR=1,01; IC 95%=0,65-1,57; p interacción <0,001). Conclusión La presencia de mayor número de síntomas/signos congestivos se asoció a una mayor mortalidad de cualquier causa a los 30 días. Individualmente, la ingurgitación yugular y la disnea de esfuerzo se asocian a mayor mortalidad a corto plazo (AU)

Background and objectives This work aims to assess whether symptoms/signs of congestion in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) evaluated in hospital emergency departments (HED) allows for predicting short-term progress. Patients and methods The study group comprised consecutive patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 HED from EAHFE Registry. We collected clinical variables of systemic congestion (edema in the lower extremities, jugular vein distention, hepatomegaly) and pulmonary congestion (dyspnea on exertion, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, orthopnea, and pulmonary crackles) and analyzed their individual and group association with all-cause 30-day of mortality crudely and adjusted for differences between groups. Results We analyzed 18,120 patients (median=83 years, interquartile range [IQR]=76-88; women=55.7%). Of them, 44.6% had >3 congestive symptoms/signs. Individually, the 30-day adjusted risk of death increased 14% for jugular vein distention (hazard ratio [HR]=1.14, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=1.01-1.28) and 96% for dyspnea on exertion (HR=1.96, 95% CI=1.55-2.49). Assessed jointly, the risk progressively increased with the number of symptoms/signs present; compared to patients without symptoms/signs of congestion, the risk increased by 109%, 123%, and 156% in patients with 1-2, 3-5, and 6-7 symptoms/signs, respectively. These associations did not show interaction with the final disposition of the patient after their emergency care (discharge/hospitalization) with the exception of edema in the lower extremities, which had a better prognosis in discharged patients (HR=0.66, 95% CI=0.49 -0.89) than hospitalized patients (HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.65-1.57; interaction p<0.001). Conclusion The presence of a greater number of congestive symptoms/signs was associated with greater all-cause 30-day mortality. Individually, jugular vein distention and dyspnea on exertion were associated with higher short-term mortality (AU)

El modelo Clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and related costs (COHERENT). Aplicación en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca / The Clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and related costs (COHERENT) model. Application in heart failure patients

Introducción y objetivos: Los resultados combinados se utilizan ampliamente, pero tienen diversas limitaciones. El modelo Clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and related costs (COHERENT) es una aproximación nueva para presentar y comparar visualmente todos los componentes de los resultados combinados (incidencia, tiempo, duración) y los costes relacionados. El objetivo es evaluar su utilidad en una cohorte de pacientes. Métodos: Se diseñó un sistema de colores que representa gráficamente el porcentaje de pacientes en cada situación clínica (estado vital y ubicación: domicilio, urgencias, hospital), codificada jerárquicamente, en cada momento del seguimiento. Se aplicó a 1.126 pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda de 25 hospitales seguidos durante 30 días tras su visita a urgencias, y se calculó el tiempo en cada situación clínica y sus costes sanitarios. Resultados: El modelo ilustra visualmente los componentes del objetivo combinado a los 30 días (el 2,12% en urgencias, el 23,6% en hospitalización índice, el 2,7% en reingresos, el 65,5% vivo en casa y el 6,02% fallecido) y muestra diferencias significativas entre grupos de pacientes, hospitales o sistemas sanitarios. El instrumento también calcula y muestra los costes diarios y acumulados (total, 4.895.070 euros; media, 144,91 euros/paciente/día). Conclusiones: El modelo COHERENT es un nuevo método para mostrar visualmente resultados combinados y sus costes que permite comparar grupos de pacientes y cohortes. El nuevo sistema puede ser útil como un nuevo criterio de valoración para ensayos clínicos o estudios observacionales, y un instrumento para la evaluación comparativa, la planificación clínica, el análisis económico y la implementación de la atención sanitaria basada en valor (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Composite endpoints are widely used but have several limitations. The Clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and related costs (COHERENT) model is a new approach for visually displaying and comparing composite endpoints including all their components (incidence, timing, duration) and related costs. We aimed to assess the validity of the COHERENT model in a patient cohort. Methods: A color graphic system displaying the percentage of patients in each clinical situation (vital status and location: at home, emergency department [ED] or hospital) and related costs at each time point during follow-up was created based on a list of mutually exclusive clinical situations coded in a hierarchical fashion. The system was tested in a cohort of 1126 patients with acute heart failure from 25 hospitals. The system calculated and displayed the time spent in each clinical situation and health care resource utilization-related costs over 30 days. Results: The model illustrated the times spent over 30 days (2.12% in ED, 23.6% in index hospitalization, 2.7% in readmissions, 65.5% alive at home, and 6.02% dead), showing significant differences between patient groups, hospitals, and health care systems. The tool calculated and displayed the daily and cumulative health care-related costs over time (total, €4 895 070; mean, €144.91 per patient/d). Conclusions: The COHERENT model is a new, easy-to-interpret, visual display of composite endpoints, enabling comparisons between patient groups and cohorts, including related costs. The model may constitute a useful new approach for clinical trials or observational studies, and a tool for benchmarking, and value-based health care implementation (AU)

Prevalencia e impacto en el pronóstico del bloqueo de rama derecha en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda: hallazgos del registro RICA / Prevalence and impact on prognosis of right-bundle branch block in patients with acute heart failure: Findings from the RICA registry

Objetivos: Determinar la prevalencia, las características y el impacto en el pronóstico del bloqueo de rama derecha (BRD) en una cohorte de pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda (ICA). Métodos: Analizamos prospectivamente 3.638 pacientes con ICA incluidos en el Registro Nacional de Insuficiencia Cardíaca de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (RICA). Analizamos de forma independiente la relación entre las características basales y clínicas y la presencia de BRD, y el impacto potencial del BRD en la mortalidad por todas las causas a un año y el evento combinado de hospitalización o muerte a 90 días después del alta. Resultados: La prevalencia de BRD fue del 10,9%. Los pacientes con BRD eran de edad más avanzada, con mayor proporción de sexo masculino y comorbilidades pulmonares, valores más altos de fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo y peor estado funcional. No hubo diferencias en riesgo para los pacientes con BRD, con un cociente de riesgo ajustado (intervalo de confianza del 95%) para la mortalidad a un año de 1,05 (0,83-1,32) y para el evento combinado a 90 días después del alta de 0,97 (0,74-1,25). Estos resultados fueron consistentes en los análisis de sensibilidad. Conclusiones: Pocos pacientes con ICA presentan BRD, que se asocia consistentemente con la edad avanzada, el sexo masculino, las comorbilidades pulmonares, la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo preservada y el peor estado funcional. Sin embargo, después de tener en cuenta estos factores, el BRD en pacientes con ICA no se asocia a peores resultados (AU)

Objectives: This work aims to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and impact on prognosis of right bundle branch block (RBBB) in a cohort of acute heart failure (AHF) patients. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 3,638 AHF patients included in the RICA registry (National Heart Failure Registry of the Spanish Internal Medicine Society). We independently analyzed the relationship between baseline and clinical characteristics and the presence of RBBB as well as the potential impact of RBBB on 1-year all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint of 90-day post-discharge hospitalization or death. Results: The prevalence of RBBB was 10.9%. Patients with RBBB were older, a higher proportion were male, had more pulmonary comorbidities, had higher left ventricular ejection fraction values, and had worse functional status. There were no differences in risk for patients with RBBB, with an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality of 1.05 (0.83-1.32), and for the composite endpoint of 90-day post-discharge hospitalization or death of 0.97 (0.74-1.25). These results were consistent on the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Few patients with AHF present with RBBB, which is consistently associated with advanced age, male sex, pulmonary comorbidities, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and worse functional status. Nonetheless, after considering these factors, RBBB in AHF patients is not associated with worse outcomes (AU)

Prevalence and impact on prognosis of right-bundle branch block in patients with acute heart failure: Findings from the RICA registry.

OBJECTIVES: This work aims to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and impact on prognosis of right bundle branch block (RBBB) in a cohort of acute heart failure (AHF) patients. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 3,638 AHF patients included in the RICA registry (National Heart Failure Registry of the Spanish Internal Medicine Society). We independently analyzed the relationship between baseline and clinical characteristics and the presence of RBBB as well as the potential impact of RBBB on 1-year all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint of 90-day post-discharge hospitalization or death. RESULTS: The prevalence of RBBB was 10.9%. Patients with RBBB were older, a higher proportion were male, had more pulmonary comorbidities, had higher left ventricular ejection fraction values, and had worse functional status. There were no differences in risk for patients with RBBB, with an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality of 1.05 (0.83-1.32), and for the composite endpoint of 90-day post-discharge hospitalization or death of 0.97 (0.74-1.25). These results were consistent on the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients with AHF present with RBBB, which is consistently associated with advanced age, male sex, pulmonary comorbidities, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and worse functional status. Nonetheless, after considering these factors, RBBB in AHF patients is not associated with worse outcomes.

Impacto de las características estructurales y organizativas hospitalarias y de urgencias en el resultado evolutivo de la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda / Impact of hospital and emergency department structural and organizational characteristics on outcomes of acute heart failure

Introducción y objetivos: Investigar si diferentes características estructurales/organizativas del hospital y del servicio de urgencias (SU) impactan en los resultados de la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA). Métodos: Análisis secundario del Registro EAHFE. Se recogieron 6 características hospitalarias y del SU, y se relacionaron con 7 resultados tras el evento índice y tras el alta, ajustados por año de inclusión, características basales y del episodio de ICA y por dichas características estructurales/organizativas. También se relacionó el porcentaje de altas directas desde urgencias (ADU) y resultados, y si había interacción según las características hospitalarias o del SU. Resultados: Cuarenta SU españoles incluyeron 17.974 episodios de ICA. Hubo menos estancias prolongadas en hospitales de alta tecnología, con hospitalización a domicilio y con SU con alta frecuentación, y más estancias prolongadas en hospitales con unidad de insuficiencia cardiaca y área de observación en urgencias. Los hospitales de alta tecnología presentaron menor mortalidad hospitalaria (OR=0,78; IC95%, 0,65-0,94). Respecto a eventos 30 días tras el alta, los hospitales con unidad de corta estancia (UCE) tuvieron más hospitalizaciones (OR=1,19; IC95%, 1,02-1,38); los SU con alta afluencia, menor mortalidad (OR=0,73; IC95%, 0,56-0,96) y eventos combinados (OR=0,87; IC95%, 0,76-0,99), y los hospitales con unidad de insuficiencia cardiaca, menos reconsultas a urgencias (OR=0,83; IC95%, 0,76-0,91), hospitalizaciones (OR=0,85; IC95%, 0,75-0,97) y eventos combinados (OR=0,84; IC95%, 0,77-0,92). A más ADU, menos estancias prolongadas. Entre otras interacciones, el incremento de ADU se asoció con más reconsultas, hospitalizaciones y eventos combinados a los 30 días del alta en hospitales sin UCE, pero no en hospitales con UCE (AU)

Introduction and objectives: To determine whether structural/organizational characteristics of hospitals and emergency departments (EDs) affect acute heart failure (AHF) outcomes. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the EAHFE Registry. Six hospital/ED characteristics were collected and were related to 7 postindex events and postdischarge outcomes, adjusted by the period of patient inclusion, baseline patient characteristics, AHF episode features, and hospital and ED characteristics. The relationship between discharge directly from the ED (DDED) and outcomes was assessed, and interaction was analyzed according to the hospital/ED characteristics. Results: We analyzed 17 974 AHF episodes included by 40 Spanish EDs. Prolonged stays were less frequent in high-technology hospitals and those with hospitalization at home and with high-inflow EDs, and were more frequent in hospitals with a heart failure unit (HFU) and an ED observation unit. In-hospital mortality was lower in high-technology hospitals (OR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.65-0.94). Analysis of 30-day postdischarge outcomes showed that hospitals with a short-stay unit (SSU) had higher hospitalization rates (OR, 1.19; 95%CI, 1.02-1.38), high-inflow EDs had lower mortality (OR, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.96) and fewer combined events (OR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.76-0.99), while hospitals with HFU had fewer ED reconsultations (OR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.76-0.91), hospitalizations (OR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.75-0.97), and combined events (OR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.77-0.92). The higher the percentage of DDED, the fewer the prolonged stays. Among other interactions, we found that more frequent DDED was associated with more 30-day postdischarge reconsultations, hospitalizations and combined events in hospitals without SSUs, but not in hospitals with an SSU. Conclusions: AHF outcomes were significantly affected by the structural/organizational characteristics of hospitals and EDs and their aggressiveness in ED management (AU)

Prognosis of acute heart failure based on clinical data of congestion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This work aims to assess whether symptoms/signs of congestion in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) evaluated in hospital emergency departments (HED) allows for predicting short-term progress. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised consecutive patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 HED from EAHFE Registry. We collected clinical variables of systemic congestion (edema in the lower extremities, jugular vein distention, hepatomegaly) and pulmonary congestion (dyspnea on exertion, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, orthopnea, and pulmonary crackles) and analysed their individual and group association with all-cause 30-day of mortality crudely and adjusted for differences between groups. RESULTS: We analysed 18,120 patients (median = 83 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 76-88; women = 55.7%). Of them, 44.6% had > 3 congestive symptoms/signs. Individually, the 30-day adjusted risk of death increased 14% for jugular vein distention (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.01-1.28) and 96% for dyspnea on exertion (HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.55-2.49). Assessed jointly, the risk progressively increased with the number of symptoms/signs present; compared to patients without symptoms/signs of congestion, the risk increased by 109%, 123 %, and 156% in patients with 1-2, 3-5, and 6-7 symptoms/signs, respectively. These associations did not show interaction with the final disposition of the patient after their emergency care (discharge/hospitalization) with the exception of edema in the lower extremities, which had a better prognosis in discharged patients (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49-0.89) than hospitalised patients (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.65-1.57; interaction p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of a greater number of congestive symptoms/signs was associated with greater all-cause 30-day mortality. Individually, jugular vein distention and dyspnea on exertion were associated with higher short-term mortality.

Análisis de la evolución de consultas atendidas en los servicios deurgencias españoles durante la primera ola pandémica / Analysis of the evolution of patients attended in Spanish emergency departments during the first wave of the pandemic

Fundamento: Describir el número de consultas, total y porCOVID-19, atendidas en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios(SUH) españoles durante marzo y abril de 2020, compararlocon el mismo periodo del año anterior, cuantificar el cambiode actividad asistencial e investigar la posible influencia deltamaño del hospital y de la seroprevalencia provincial deCOVID-19. Métodos: Estudio transversal. Se envió una encuesta a todoslos responsables de SUH españoles del sistema público de salud sobre el número de consultas atendidas durante marzo yabril de 2019 y de 2020. Se calculó el cambio de actividad asistencial por comunidad autónoma, y se comparó en función deltamaño del hospital y del impacto provincial de la pandemia.Resultados: Participaron el 66 % de los 283 SUH. Se observó undescenso del 49,2 % de las consultas totales (solo los SUH deCastilla-La Mancha mostraron un descenso inferior al 30 %) ydel 60 % de las consultas no-COVID-19 (solo los SUH de Asturias y Extremadura mostraron un descenso inferior al 50 %). elcambio de actividad asistencial no difirió en función del tamaño del hospital, pero sí en relación al impacto provincial de lapandemia, con una correlación directa respecto al descensode actividad no-COVID-19 (a mayor impacto, mayor descenso;R2 = 0,05; p = 0,002) e inversa en relación a la actividad global (amayor impacto, menor descenso; R2 = 0,05; p = 0,002).Conclusiones: Durante la primera ola pandémica descendió elnúmero de consultas en los SUH, si bien dicho descenso nose explica únicamente por la incidencia local de la pandemia.(AU)

Background: To describe the number of visits (total and perCOVID-19) attended by the Spanish hospital emergency departments (EDs) during March and April 2020 compared to thesame period in 2019, and to calculate the quantitative changesin healthcare activity and investigate the possible influence ofhospital size and regional COVID-19 seroprevalence. Method: Cross-sectional study that analyzes the number ofvisits to Spanish public EDs, reported through a survey ofED chiefs during the study periods. Changes in healthcareactivity were described in each autonomous community andcompared according to hospital size and the regional impactof the pandemic. Results: The 66% of the 283 Spanish EDs participated in thestudy. The total number of patients attended decreased to49.2 % (< 30 % in the Castilla-La Mancha region), with a 60 %reduction in non-COVID-19 patients (reduction < 50 % only inthe regions of Asturias and Extremadura). While there wereno differences in changes of healthcare activity according tothe size of the hospital, there were differences in relation tothe regional impact of the pandemic, with a direct correlationrelated to the decrease in non-COVID-19 activity (the greaterthe impact, the greater the decrease; R2 = 0.05; p = 0.002) andan inverse correlation to the overall activity (the greater theimpact, the lesser the decrease; R2 = 0.05; p = 0.002). Conclusion: There was a very significant decrease in the numberof ED visits during the first pandemic wave, although this decreasecannot be explained solely by the local incidence of the pandemic.(AU)

[Analysis of the evolution of patients attended in Spanish emergency departments during the first wave of the pandemic].

BACKGROUND: To describe the number of visits (total and per COVID-19) attended by the Spanish hospital emergency departments (EDs) during the first wave of the pandemic (March-April 2020) compared to the same period in 2019, and to calculate the quantitative changes in healthcare activity and investigate the possible influence of hospital size and COVID-19 seroprevalence. METHOD: Cross-sectional study that analyzes the number of visits to Spanish public EDs, reported through a survey of ED chiefs during the study periods. Changes in healthcare activity were described in each autonomous community and com-pared according to hospital size and the provincial impact of the pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 187 (66?%) of the 283 Spanish EDs participated in the study. The total number of patients attended de-creased to 49.2?% (

Consensus on improving the comprehensive care of patients with acute heart failure.

The latest acute heart failure (AHF) consensus document from the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC, for its initials in Spanish), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), and Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) was published in 2015, which made an update covering the main novelties regarding AHF from the last few years necessary. These include publication of updated European guidelines on HF in 2016, new studies on the pharmacological treatment of patients during hospitalization, and other recent developments regarding AHF such as early treatment, intermittent treatment, advanced HF, and refractory congestion. This consensus document was drafted with the aim of updating all aspects related to AHF and to create a document that comprehensively describes the diagnosis, treatment, and management of this disease.